E-cigarettes Fda Ban
E Cigarettes Fda Ban
Addiction The Dirty Little Secret About Electronic Cigarettes and Propylene Glycol
Warnings issued by big tobacco and big pharma about the dangers of propylene glycol are not grounded in scientific reality or backed by scientific research. After a study in mice at the University of Chicago's Billings Hospital in 1942, it was thought that propylene glycol when inhaled might cause such diseases as pneumonia and other illnesses affecting the respiratory system. To determine long term effects followup studies on money and other animals were conducted. This larger study produced results that showed no ill effects from propylene glycol in the lungs.
Shouting "danger", the FDA and tobacco companies point to an ingredient that has proven safe through many years of use. The misinformation about propylene glycol ignores one very important fact. We know e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco products when inhaled. We know smoking almost anything is safer than smoking tobacco.
In e-cigarettes propylene glycol is used to dilute the nicotine and provide a solution that can be vaporized and deliver nicotine to the e-smoker. PG is a commonly used food additive and is the substance used in fog machines. It also appears on the label of ingredients of many of the food products we routinely buy.
It is interesting that the many cautions about propylene glycol found online are not found on scientific or medical sites or referenced as articles in scientific journals. The dire warnings are on conspiracy blogs, natural healing sites and on the sites of anti-smoking groups. Several entries claim that propylene glycol is antifreeze. No. Not true. That would be ethylene glycol.
A fantastic amount of information can be found online but it's important to know who you are listening when accepting information as fact. Baby wipes contain PG and it's difficult to imagine the FDA making claims that a product freely allowed for use on infants is now unsafe for adults. The PG delivered to the user by the best electronic cigarettes is minimal. Some e-liquid suppliers use glycerol as a base for their nicotine solution rather than propylene glycol.
Consumers are smart to closely examine ingredients in the products they eat or inhale. We have all become more educated about food additives that may cause problems even as they add healthy color. We know to check for a variety of terms when looking for low sugar product as sucrose, fructose and various "syrups" are alternate names for sugar.
The saccharin scare thirty years ago is a valuable example of the folly of acting on incomplete information and drawing incorrect conclusions. The FDA banned saccharine which was a very popular sweetener used as an additive in many packaged foods and. The FDA stated saccharin had caused cancer in mice and panic ensued. Companies lost a lot of money in changing the ingredients in their products and the public tossed out boxes of Sweet and Low which was a popular saccharin product.
What the FDA didn't tell the public was that the research did not apply to people. The mice had been given huge doses of saccharin daily. Adjusting the amount to that needed for a person to develop cancer would require the person to consume at least 400 cans of diet cola every day for months. Today, saccharin is once again fully available for sale to the public.
The delivery of vapor for e-cig users relies on the use of propylene glycol. The tobacco companies continue to spread false information about PG even though there is no scientific data to prove their claims
If you would like more information on addiction dependency solutions please visit http://AddictionFreeLiving.org
About the Author
Mary Kay Rivers is a true expert in the field of electronic cigarettes. Her publications about
electronic cigarettes and COPD
or about the
best Electronic Cigarette
are very popular.
addiction: addiction
This article, the best article ever, kindly provided by UberArticles.com
Opinions on the FDA banning electronic cigarettes?
Any opinions on the electronic cigarettes? I have seen several reports on fox such as http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_OFYGbeE0A and articles on wallstreet, NY times, and yahoo the past few days on the banning of E Cig's. If they do not produce smoke then why would the FDA claim them dangerous and keep regular tobacco industries striving? I mean seriously..
Attempt to slow the process of E Cigarettes means the regular tobacco industry is taking a hit. The FDA claims inadequate knowledge when it comes to what exactly they are comprised of. An Electronic Cigarette is a heating water vaporizer comprised of a battery & refill cartridge. It offers cigarette users a safer alternative in which is highly used and proven by the users themselves. A good thing to remember is there is a Nicotine Level in which you can follow as well as different flavors. If you smoke cigarettes i recommend you at least give the E Cig a try.
Regular Cigarette vs. Electronic Cigarette
24mg-comparable to "non filters" (designed for the heavy smoker)
18mg-comparable to "full flavored"
11mg-comparable to "mediums"
6mg-comparable to "ultra-lights"
0mg=comparable with flavor but NO NICOTINE AT ALL. (Still packs a flavorful punch)
Flavors include traditional, menthol, classic tobacco generally.
The video you linked above also did you know that John Cameron is the brother of James Cameron the director of Avatar? interesting Fact haha..
| To display Amazon results, you must first enter a keyword or keyword phrase. Please consult the user manual. |
